Before the Court was Plaintiffs’ motion to compel requesting, among other things, that a representative of Defendant be present to “provide a download of all available data from event recorders and other components and equipment of the crossing signal system.”  Id. at *3.   The Court, in granting the motion, ruled that to the extent that the data requested “is relevant and stored on-site”, the request was reasonable.  Id. at *7.  Specifically, Rule 34(a)(1) contemplates “the translation of electronically-stored information into a ‘reasonably usable form.’” Id.   Thus, the Defendant was also “directed to arrange for an employee to be on-site during the inspection to provide a download of all available date from event recorders and other components and equipment of the crossing signal system that is stored on-site.” Id.